Close the gap betweenthe English teacher you want to beandthe teacher your hours allow.
TeachLex is the CEFR-aligned assessment and writing platform for teachers of multilingual students. It builds the tests, drafts the marking, and reads every student submission for level, habits, and gaps.
Spend less time on prep and more time with your students.
Build a test, a writing assignment, or a grammar exercise. Tests cover seven question types, from multiple choice to short answer to error correction. Writing assignments carry your own rubric and a target level. Create from your own materials, or have the first draft built for you.
See it built →Every submission tells a story.
Vocabulary and grammar placed on the CEFR scale from the student’s own work, sentence structure measured against their established range, and named gaps rather than a score. Every comparison is with their earlier work, never with classmates.
See the analysis →Grade where your judgment actually matters.
Tests put your attention on the answers that need your judgment. Written work comes back rubric-drafted with a confidence level, yours to shape. Nothing reaches a student until you release it.
See a draft →Know the learner, not just the score.
Where is their English?
Vocabulary and grammar placed on the CEFR scale from every piece of work, with the trend visible as it moves. Not once a year on a placement test.
How do they write?
Every session seen as it happened: drafting, pausing, revising, read against that student’s own established rhythm. Fourteen weeks of history behind every comparison.
What are they missing?
Named, specific gaps: the grammar pattern still developing, the vocabulary sitting below target. Precise enough to become Tuesday’s lesson.
Also in every plan: CEFR vocabulary profiling A1 to C2 · practice generated from what your results showed · class join codes and QR entry · Google Classroom roster import · availability windows and time limits · class, test, and question analytics.
Every student sees their own record, in full.
Their level. Their teacher's feedback, released only when their teacher is ready. The grammar patterns to practice, quoted from their own sentences. And exactly what was recorded while they wrote, explained in plain language.
No comparison with anyone else.
The interpretation stays with the teacher. The record belongs to the writer.
There is mechanical work in marking, and there is teaching.
Reading fifty short answers against a rubric you wrote yourself is mechanical work. Knowing what that writing means for the student in front of you is teaching. TeachLex takes the first job and never touches the second.
Objective questions grade themselves the moment a student submits. Written answers get a drafted score and drafted feedback, each carrying a confidence level. Where confidence is low, the platform says so plainly and waits for you. Nothing reaches a student until you release it, and every draft is yours to rewrite.
The system says less when it knows less. That is the whole design philosophy, and it is why your professional judgment is the last word on this platform rather than the first thing it replaces.
Plans that fit a real timetable.
Annual pricing shown. Every plan carries 40 students per class, which is Japan's legal maximum, so a real class always fits.
Objective grading never uses credits.
Be first through the door.
TeachLex opens to a small group of teachers first. Leave your email and your invitation will arrive before public launch.
No credit card. One email when your invitation is ready.
No. Teachers and institutions pay. Students join with a code and use it free.
Objective grading is free forever on every plan, including Free.
No. It shows how a piece was written compared with that student’s own history. You decide.